XB-ART-46276
Dev Dyn
2013 Feb 01;2422:164-78. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23905.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Early development of the thymus in Xenopus laevis.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: Although Xenopus laevis has been a model of choice for comparative and developmental studies of the immune system, little is known about organogenesis of the thymus, a primary lymphoid organ in vertebrates. Here we examined the expression of three transcription factors that have been functionally associated with pharyngeal gland development, gcm2, hoxa3, and foxn1, and evaluated the neural crest contribution to thymus development. RESULTS: In most species Hoxa3 is expressed in the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm where it directs thymus formation. In Xenopus, the thymus primordium is derived from the second pharyngeal pouch endoderm, which is hoxa3-negative, suggesting that a different mechanism regulates thymus formation in frogs. Unlike other species foxn1 is not detected in the epithelium of the pharyngeal pouch in Xenopus, rather, its expression is initiated as thymic epithelial cell starts to differentiate and express MHC class II molecules. Using transplantation experiments we show that while neural crest cells populate the thymus primordia, they are not required for the specification and initial development of this organ or for T-cell differentiation in frogs. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide novel information on early thymus development in Xenopus, and highlight a number of features that distinguish Xenopus from other organisms.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 23172757
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3640628
???displayArticle.link??? Dev Dyn
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]
R01 DE014212 NIDCR NIH HHS, R01DE014212 NIDCR NIH HHS
Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: ctse foxn1 gcm2 hoxa3 myh6 rag1 sox10 tec tp63 uqcc6
???displayArticle.antibodies??? Tp63 Ab1
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
|
|
Fig. 1. Developmental anatomy of the thymus. A: The thymus primordia are recognizable at around stage 47 (arrows). C: Transverse section of a stage-47 tadpole, at the level of the pharynx (ph); dorsal towards the top. The thymus primordia (arrows) are located lateral and ventral to the hindbrain (hb), between the eye and the developing inner ear (ie), as seen on a longitudinal section (D). F: Higher magnification view of the right thymic primordium shown in E. Longitudinal section of a stage-47 tadpole, anterior towards the top. G: At stage 50, the thymus primordia have increased in size but retained their dorsolateral position (arrows). G, I: Phase contrast. H: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the same section. K,L: Expression of p63, an epithelial stem cell factor. I,J are a higher magnification view of G,H. L is a higher magnification view of K. Transverse sections, dorsal towards the top. M,N: At stage 55, the thymus has been extensively colonized by the NC-derived pigment cells (arrows). N is a higher magnification view of the thymus shown in M. Dorsal views, anterior toward the top. O: On a transverse section, the cortex (cx) and me- dulla (md) of the thymus are now clearly distinguishable. The dashed circle outlines the medulla in Q. P and Q are higher magnification views of O. Scale bars (A, D) 1â4 500 mm; (B, C, E, G, H, N, P) 1â4 200 mm; (F, I, J, K, Q) 1â4 100 mm; (M) 1â4 2 mm; (O) 1â4 1 mm. |
|
|
Fig. 2. Early development of the thymus primordia. Histological sections illustrating the formation of the thymus primordium (arrows) from the pharyngeal pouch epithelium (arrowheads) in Xenopus tadpoles at stages 415. For each stage, both sides of the pharyngeal region are shown (lateral panels). The central panels are lower magnification views, composite pictures of both sides. Dorsal bilateral outpocketings of the pharyn- geal epithelium are first visible at stage 41. The thymus primordium is completely separated from the pharyngeal pouch by stage 45. Transverse sections through the hindbrain region at a level posterior to the eye and anterior to the developing inner ear, dorsal to top. The scale bars in the lateral and middle panels 14 100 and 200 mm, respectively. |
|
|
Fig. 3. Developmental expression of gcm2. A,B: gcm2 was first detected at stage 31 by whole mount in situ hybridization in two longitudinal stripes in the pharyngeal region. At stage 32 (C,D) and stage 34 (E,F), gcm2 was now expressed in three distinct stripes. At stage 40 (G,H) and by stage 41 (I), gcm2 expression appeared to be confined to the developing gills (arrows). A: Lateral views, dorsal towards the top, anterior to the left. B, D, F, H are higher magnification views of the embryos shown in A, C, E, G. In situ hybridization on longitudinal sections of stage-32 (J,K) and stage-34 (L,M) embryos confirmed the expression of gcm2 in the endoderm and ectoderm components of the second, third, and fourth pha- ryngeal arches, with stronger expression in the third arch. For J,K and L,M, the level of the section is indicated by a white line in D and F, respec- tively. In J, anterior towards the top. N,O: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of a section through the thoracic region of a 3-month-old (90 days) froglet. The parathyroid (arrow) was located in the vicinity of the aortic arch arteries. O is a higher magnification view of the parathyroid shown in N. aa, aortic arch artery; ca, carotid artery; pa, pulmonary artery; ph, pharynx; pp, pharyngeal pouches; IIV, pharyngeal arches. In each panel, the stage/age is indicated in the lower left corner. The scale bars (A, C, E and G) 1â4 500 mm; (B, D, F, H, and I) 1â4 250 mm; (J, L, and N) 1â4 200 mm; (K, M, and O) 1â4 100 mm. P: In 3-month-old froglets, Gcm2 was specifically detected in the parathyroid (Pa) by real time RT-PCR, while in other tis- sues, including brain (Br), heart (He), and thymus (Th), gcm2 was essentially undetectable. |
|
|
Fig. 4. Developmental expression of hoxa3. A: hoxa3 expression at stage 22 (A,B) and stage 24 (C,D) was restricted to the spinal cord with an anterior boundary of expression corresponding to rhombomere 5. hoxa3 was also expressed in the migrating NC cells. At stage 32 (E) and stage 34 (I), NC cells had colonized the third and fourth pharyngeal arches (IIIV) where they still expressed hoxa3. At this stage, hoxa3 was also detected in the pharyngeal endoderm epithelium of the arches, but was excluded from the mesoderm core. The level of the sections is indi- cated by a black line in F, J, N. At stage 41 (M), the primordium of the thymus emerging from the second pharyngeal pouch was surrounded by hoxa3-negative NC cells (arrows). For whole mount in situ hybridization, anterior to left, dorsal to top except for A, C, which are dorsal view. G, H, K, L are longitudinal sections, anterior towards the top. O, P are transverse sections, dorsal to top. ph, pharynx; pp, pharyngeal pouches; IIV, pharyngeal arches. In each panel, the stage is indicated in the lower left corner. The scale bars in (A, I, and M) 1â4 500 mm; (F, J, and N) 1â4 250 mm; (G, K, and O) 1â4 200 mm; (H, L, and P) 1â4 100 mm. |
|
|
Fig. 5. Sequence and developmental expression of foxn1. A: The deduced amino acid sequences of Foxn1 from human, mouse, chicken, and zebrafish were aligned using ClustalW2 and compared to the partial amino acid sequence of Xenopus laevis Foxn1. The highly conserved fork- head domain is underlined |
|
|
Fig. 5. Sequence and developmental expression of foxn1. B: By whole mount in situ hybridization, foxn1 was first detected at stage 47 (arrows) lateral to the hindbrain (hb). In situ hybridization on transverse sections of stage-47 (C,D) and stage-48 (E,F) tadpoles. foxn1 was completely restricted to the thymus primordium (arrows). foxn1 expression in the thymus persisted at least up to stage 57 (G), at which stage foxn1 was weakly detected throughout the entire organ. D, F are higher magnification views of the thymus primordium shown in C, E, respectively. In each panel the stage is indicated in the lower left corner. The scale bar (B) 1â4 500 mm; (C, E, and G) 1â4 200 mm; (D and F) 1â4 200 mm. |
|
|
Fig. 6. RT-PCR analysis of the developmental expression of hoxa3, gcm2, and foxn1. The stages are according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (1967). Th, thymus from stage-55 tadpoles. Orni- thine decarboxylase (odc) is shown as a loading control. |
|
|
Fig. 7. NC contribution to the thymus. A: Experimental design to analyze the NC contribution to the thymus. Two-cell-stage embryos were injected in the animal pole with mRNA encoding Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP). At stage 17, the RFP-labeled cardiac NC was transplanted onto the same region of an unlabeled host embryo (NC graft). B: RFP-labeled NC graft at stage 26. Lateral views of the same embryo. Dorsal towards the top, anterior to the right (B,C) and left (D,E). Cells derived from the RFP-labeled NC graft were confined to the three most posterior streams of cranial NC, as previously described (Lee and Saint-Jeannet, 2011). At stage 41 (F), cells derived from the RFP-labeled NC graft (JO) formed most of the head mesenchyme, surrounding the thymus primordial (arrows). A fraction of the RFP-labeled NC cells also express hoxa3; however, these cells remained confined to a region posterior to the thymus primordia (G, I, M, J, N). H, L are higher magnification of F. I, M are higher magnification of G. Longitudinal sections, anterior towards the top. K and O are overlay of H and L, respectively. Insets in K, O are higher magnification views of the thymus primordia (arrows). P: At stage 47, the thymus primordia can be identified by Foxn1 expression (Q, S, W). A small number of RFP-labeled NC cells have colonized the thymus (T, U, X, Y). R are higher magnification views of the thymus primordium (arrows) in P, Q. R and V show two representative tadpoles form two independent experiments. U and Y are overlay of R and V, respec- tively. The scale bars (B, P, and Q) 1â4 200 mm; (H and R) 1â4 50 mm. |
|
|
Fig. 8. NC cells are dispensable for thymus development. A: Diagram illustrating cardiac NC ablation at stage 17. B: sox10 expression in con- trol and NC-ablated embryos at stage 17 (B and E), and stage 25 (C,D and F,G). The red brackets in control (B) and NC-ablated (E) embryos indi- cate the position of cardiac NC territory ablated at stage 17. NC ablation resulted in the bilateral loss of the three most posterior NC streams at stage 25 (F,G) as compared to control (red brackets in C and D). In NC-ablated embryos, sox10 expression in the otic vesicle is unaffected (arrows). B and E are dorsal views, anterior to top. C and D (control) and F and G (NC-ablated) are showing both sides of the same embryo. Dor- sal to top, anterior to right (C and F) or to left (D and G). H: Transverse sections (dorsal to top) through two stage-47 tadpoles (H and K) following NC ablation at stage 17. foxn1 expression was detected in the thymus primordia of both tadpoles. H, J and K, M are higher magnifica- tion views of the thymi shown in I and L, respectively. I, L: The arrows point to the thymus primordia expressing foxn1. The scale bars in (B) 1â4 500 mm; (H, J, K, and M) 1â4 50 mm; (I and L) 1â4 200 mm. N,O: The thymi of control (n1â49) and NC-ablated (n1â49) tadpoles were dissected at stage 48 and analyzed by real time RT-PCR for foxn1 (N) and rag1 (O) expression. foxn1 and rag1 expression was normalized to the expression of the TEC-specific marker, keratin 8. Statistical significance was determined using the t-test. The values are presented as mean SEM. |
|
|
gcm2 (glial cells missing homolog 2) gene expression in Xenopus laevis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 32 ,dorsal view, anterior left, dorsal up, and longitudinal section, anterior top. |
|
|
gcm2 (glial cells missing homolog 2) gene expression in Xenopus laevis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 40 ,dorsal view, anterior left, dorsal up. |
|
|
hoxa3 (homeobox A3) gene expression in Xenopus laevis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 22,dorsal view, anterior left, dorsal up. |
|
|
hoxa3 (homeobox A3) gene expression in Xenopus laevis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 32,dorsal view, anterior left, dorsal up, and longitudinal section, anterior up. |
|
|
Thymus primordium, in X. laevis NF stage 47 tadpole, indicated by arrows, via gene expression of foxn1 (forkhead box N1), visualised via in situ hybridization.( hb is hindbrain ). |
References [+] :
Blackburn,
Developing a new paradigm for thymus organogenesis.
2004, Pubmed
Blackburn, Developing a new paradigm for thymus organogenesis. 2004, Pubmed
Blackburn, The nu gene acts cell-autonomously and is required for differentiation of thymic epithelial progenitors. 1996, Pubmed
Bockman, Dependence of thymus development on derivatives of the neural crest. 1984, Pubmed
Chen, Mouse and zebrafish Hoxa3 orthologues have nonequivalent in vivo protein function. 2010, Pubmed
Coleman, Ultrastructural observations on the parathyroid glands of Xenopus laevis Daudin. 1969, Pubmed , Xenbase
Dooley, FGFR2IIIb signaling regulates thymic epithelial differentiation. 2007, Pubmed
Du Pasquier, The immune system of Xenopus. 1989, Pubmed , Xenbase
Du Pasquier, The thymus during the ontogeny of the toad Xenopus laevis: growth, membrane-bound immunoglobulins and mixed lymphocyte reaction. 1973, Pubmed , Xenbase
Du Pasquier, Expression of MHC class II antigens during Xenopus development. 1990, Pubmed , Xenbase
Foster, Contribution of neural crest-derived cells in the embryonic and adult thymus. 2008, Pubmed
Ge, Evolution of thymus organogenesis. 2013, Pubmed
Gordon, Functional evidence for a single endodermal origin for the thymic epithelium. 2004, Pubmed
Gordon, Gcm2 and Foxn1 mark early parathyroid- and thymus-specific domains in the developing third pharyngeal pouch. 2001, Pubmed
Gordon, Mechanisms of thymus organogenesis and morphogenesis. 2011, Pubmed
Greenhalgh, Characterization and expression of recombination activating genes (RAG-1 and RAG-2) in Xenopus laevis. 1993, Pubmed , Xenbase
Grevellec, The pharyngeal pouches and clefts: Development, evolution, structure and derivatives. 2010, Pubmed
Grevellec, Shh signalling restricts the expression of Gcm2 and controls the position of the developing parathyroids. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Griffith, Increased thymus- and decreased parathyroid-fated organ domains in Splotch mutant embryos. 2009, Pubmed
Günther, Genetic ablation of parathyroid glands reveals another source of parathyroid hormone. 2000, Pubmed
Harland, In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Henry, TGF-beta signals and a pattern in Xenopus laevis endodermal development. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hogan, Zebrafish gcm2 is required for gill filament budding from pharyngeal ectoderm. 2004, Pubmed
Holländer, Cellular and molecular events during early thymus development. 2006, Pubmed
Hunt, A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. 1991, Pubmed
Itoi, Mesenchymal cells are required for functional development of thymic epithelial cells. 2007, Pubmed
Jiang, Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. 2000, Pubmed
Kaestner, Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. 2000, Pubmed
Klug, Cutting edge: thymocyte-independent and thymocyte-dependent phases of epithelial patterning in the fetal thymus. 2002, Pubmed
Le Douarin, Tracing of cells of the avian thymus through embryonic life in interspecific chimeras. 1975, Pubmed
Lee, Cardiac neural crest is dispensable for outflow tract septation in Xenopus. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Le Lièvre, Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. 1975, Pubmed
Liu, Gcm2 is required for the differentiation and survival of parathyroid precursor cells in the parathyroid/thymus primordia. 2007, Pubmed
Manley, Transcriptional regulation of thymus organogenesis and thymic epithelial cell differentiation. 2010, Pubmed
Manley, Hox group 3 paralogs regulate the development and migration of the thymus, thyroid, and parathyroid glands. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Manley, The role of Hoxa-3 in mouse thymus and thyroid development. 1995, Pubmed
Manning, Histogenesis of lymphoid organs in larvae of the South African clawed toad, Xenopus laevis (Daudin). 1969, Pubmed , Xenbase
McNulty, Knockdown of the complete Hox paralogous group 1 leads to dramatic hindbrain and neural crest defects. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
MILLER, Immunological function of the thymus. 1961, Pubmed
Müller, Neural crest origin of perivascular mesenchyme in the adult thymus. 2008, Pubmed
Nehls, New member of the winged-helix protein family disrupted in mouse and rat nude mutations. 1994, Pubmed
Nehls, Two genetically separable steps in the differentiation of thymic epithelium. 1996, Pubmed
Nelms, Functional interaction between Foxd3 and Pax3 in cardiac neural crest development. 2011, Pubmed
Neves, Modulation of Bmp4 signalling in the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions that take place in early thymus and parathyroid development in avian embryos. 2012, Pubmed
Okabe, The origin of the parathyroid gland. 2004, Pubmed
Pasqualetti, Ectopic Hoxa2 induction after neural crest migration results in homeosis of jaw elements in Xenopus. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Revest, Development of the thymus requires signaling through the fibroblast growth factor receptor R2-IIIb. 2001, Pubmed
Robert, Comparative and developmental study of the immune system in Xenopus. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Robert, The genus Xenopus as a multispecies model for evolutionary and comparative immunobiology of the 21st century. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Robert, Ontogeny of CTX expression in xenopus. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Rodewald, Thymus organogenesis. 2008, Pubmed
Saldivar, Rhombomere of origin determines autonomous versus environmentally regulated expression of Hoxa-3 in the avian embryo. 1996, Pubmed
Schatz, V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation. 2011, Pubmed
Schorpp, Characterization of mouse and human nude genes. 1997, Pubmed
Schorpp, A zebrafish orthologue (whnb) of the mouse nude gene is expressed in the epithelial compartment of the embryonic thymic rudiment. 2002, Pubmed
Senoo, p63 Is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. 2007, Pubmed
Shapiro, The Topography and Histology of the Parathyroid Glandules in Xenopus laevis. 1933, Pubmed , Xenbase
Slack, An interaction between dorsal and ventral regions of the marginal zone in early amphibian embryos. 1980, Pubmed , Xenbase
Srivastav, Amphibian parathyroids: morphological and functional aspects. 1995, Pubmed
Suniara, An essential role for thymic mesenchyme in early T cell development. 2000, Pubmed
Wurdak, DiGeorge syndrome and pharyngeal apparatus development. 2006, Pubmed
