XB-ART-54324
Mol Biol Cell
2018 Feb 01;293:304-316. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-09-0540.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Prc1E and Kif4A control microtubule organization within and between large Xenopus egg asters.
Nguyen PA, Field CM, Mitchison TJ.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The cleavage furrow in Xenopus zygotes is positioned by two large microtubule asters that grow out from the poles of the first mitotic spindle. Where these asters meet at the midplane, they assemble a disk-shaped interaction zone consisting of anti-parallel microtubule bundles coated with chromosome passenger complex (CPC) and centralspindlin that instructs the cleavage furrow. Here we investigate the mechanism that keeps the two asters separate and forms a distinct boundary between them, focusing on the conserved cytokinesis midzone proteins Prc1 and Kif4A. Prc1E, the egg orthologue of Prc1, and Kif4A were recruited to anti-parallel bundles at interaction zones between asters in Xenopus egg extracts. Prc1E was required for Kif4A recruitment but not vice versa. Microtubule plus-end growth slowed and terminated preferentially within interaction zones, resulting in a block to interpenetration that depended on both Prc1E and Kif4A. Unexpectedly, Prc1E and Kif4A were also required for radial order of large asters growing in isolation, apparently to compensate for the direction-randomizing influence of nucleation away from centrosomes. We propose that Prc1E and Kif4, together with catastrophe factors, promote "anti-parallel pruning" that enforces radial organization within asters and generates boundaries to microtubule growth between asters.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 29187577
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC5996955
???displayArticle.link??? Mol Biol Cell
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]
R01 GM039565 NIGMS NIH HHS
Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: aurka aurkb cdca9 kif4a mag mapre1 prc1
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
|
|
FIGURE 1: Kif4A localization at aster interaction zones in zygotes. Xenopus eggs were fixed between first mitosis and first cleavage (70–100 min postfertilization), triple stained for Kif4A, AurkB (a subunit of the CPC), and tubulin, and imaged by laser scanning confocal microscopy in a clearing solvent. (A) Anaphase–telophase. Kif4A is enriched at anti-parallel bundles between asters. At this stage, it is still present on mitotic chromosomes (Chr). (B) Shortly before the asters reach the cortex. Kif4A is enriched at the interaction zone between asters, where it colocalizes with the CPC. (C) Similar stage to B, different embryo. Higher magnification of the interaction zone between asters illustrating anti-parallel microtubule bundles with Kif4A and CPC enriched at the midline. |
|
|
FIGURE 2: Localization of Prc1E and Kif4A in interphase egg extracts. (a) Spinning disk confocal time-lapse sequence of asters nucleated from AurkA beads in interphase extract. Probes: microtubules (Alexa 647-tubulin), mCherry-Prc1E, and Kif4A-GFP (Supplemental Video 1). (b) Widefield sequence using GFP-DasraA subunit to visualize the CPC (Supplemental Video 2). (a′, b′) Kymograph analysis along a 30-μm-wide line (cyan box in a and b). Note that the CPC is more focused in interaction zones than Prc1E or Kif4A. |
|
|
FIGURE 3: Visualization of microtubule dynamics between asters. Panels a–h show analysis of EB1-GFP trajectories imaged by spinning disk confocal microscopy at interaction zones between two asters. (a) EB1 comet trajectories colored by mean direction. (b) EB1 comet trajectories colored by instantaneous velocity. (c) EB1 comet initiations colored by velocity for 5 s after initiation. (d) EB1 comet termination colored by velocity 5 s before termination. (e) Spatial distributions EB1 comet trajectories classified by direction (gray dots: fraction of EB1 comets moving from left to right; blue curve: sigmoidal fit to grey dots; red curve: sigmoidal fit to fraction of EB1 comets moving in opposite direction). (f) Mean instantaneous growth rates (mean ± SEM). (g) EB1 comet density. (h) Fractions of EB1 comets that are growth initiation/terminations (mean ± SD), n = 12 neighboring ROIs (see Materials and Methods for data analysis). (i) Tubulin-A647 image sequence of a field of asters growing and interacting; 20× widefield. Interaction zones between asters were established by 24 min in this example. Note that the microtubule density between asters remained approximately constant for a further 40 min, showing that there is no increase in the density of anti-parallel bundles over time. Images were linearly rescaled to 8 bits to correct for mild photobleaching over the long image sequence. |
|
|
FIGURE 4: Immunodepletion of Prc1E and Kif4A. (a) Low-mag widefield tubulin images of asters depleted as shown or treated with 100 μM ZM-447439 (AurkB inhibitor). Prc1E and Kif4A depletion had no discernalbe effect on nucleation of microtubule density. AurkB inhibition caused descrease of MT density over time. (b–e) High-mag TIRF images showing microtubules (Alexa 647-tubulin), mCherry-Prc1E, and Kif4A-GFP under the depletion/inhibition above. Zoom-ups of boxed areas are shown on the right. Note that Kif4A localization to bundles depended on Prc1E. Prc1E localization did not depend on Kif4A, but bundles were more spread out in its absence. Both proteins were recruited to bundles when AurkB was inhibited, but the bundles are much more spread out. |
|
|
FIGURE 5: Prc1E and Kif4A are required for the block to interpenetration between asters. (a–f) Analyses of microtubule growth directions by EB1 tracking of spinning disk confocal images sequences as per Figure 2a. Depletions and add-backs as noted. (g) The D60 parameter, a metric for the degree of interpenetration, was defined as the difference between the interpolated distances where the red and blue curves crossed 60% (see panel a). Plot of mean D60 values (± SD) measured for each treatment (n ≥ 3 interaction zones each). The last two bars (control and AurkB inhibition with 100 μM ZM-447439) were replotted from Nguyen et al. (2014) to provide a comparison. Asterisks indicate significant of different from control IgG depletion based on unpaired t test analyses, *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. |
|
|
FIGURE 6: Prc1E and Kif4A enforce radial order in isolated asters. (a–e) Plus-end growth trajectories within isolated asters colored by mean direction. Imaging and EB1 tracking methods similar to Figure 2a. Asterisks indicate position of the nucleating center, Immunodepletion/add back conditions as labeled. (a′–e′) Radial order heat maps showing the local radial order quantified by the R parameter; each square cell measures 5 × 5 μm2 (see Materials and Methods). Redder colors represent higher radial order. White pixels contained too few comet tracks to measure radial order. (f) Radial order parameter R as a function of distance from the aster center for the five asters shown above. Error bars are standard deviations (see Materials and Methods for analysis). Data are truncated at <20 μm, where microtubule growth components in the z-axis complicate analysis. |
|
|
FIGURE 7: Examples of anti-parallel overlaps in growing asters being eliminated. Examples of anti-parallel microtubule overlap formation and elimination at the edge of growing asters imaged by spinning disk confocal microscopy (Supplemental Videos 7 and 8). Proteins visualized: (a) Alexa 647-tubulin and Kif4A-GFP, Alexa 647-tubulin; (b) Kif4A-GFP, and mCherry-Prc1E. Arrowheads indicate the following: likely plus ends (red), likely minus ends (cyan), microtubule growing out radially from aster (empty), and microtubule growing in opposite direction (full). (a′,b′) Kymographs of examples above along the radially growing microtubule. Events indicated: likely catastrophe (c), likely stabilization (st), and likely rescue (r). |
|
|
FIGURE 8: Model for function of Prc1E and Kif4A within and between asters. Left box, general function of Prc1E and Kif4A in anti-parallel bundles. Middle box, block to interpenetration at the interaction zone between asters. Right box, enforcement of radial order within single asters by pruning of anti-parallel overlaps. Left box, general function of Prc1E and Kif4A in anti-parallel bundles. Middle box, Block to interpenetration at the interaction zone between asters. Right box, enforcement of radial order within single asters by pruning of anti-parallel overlaps. |
|
|
FIGURE 1:. Kif4A localization at aster interaction zones in zygotes. Xenopus eggs were fixed between first mitosis and first cleavage (70â100 min postfertilization), triple stained for Kif4A, AurkB (a subunit of the CPC), and tubulin, and imaged by laser scanning confocal microscopy in a clearing solvent. (A) Anaphaseâtelophase. Kif4A is enriched at anti-parallel bundles between asters. At this stage, it is still present on mitotic chromosomes (Chr). (B) Shortly before the asters reach the cortex. Kif4A is enriched at the interaction zone between asters, where it colocalizes with the CPC. (C) Similar stage to B, different embryo. Higher magnification of the interaction zone between asters illustrating anti-parallel microtubule bundles with Kif4A and CPC enriched at the midline. |
|
|
FIGURE 2:. Localization of Prc1E and Kif4A in interphase egg extracts. (a) Spinning disk confocal time-lapse sequence of asters nucleated from AurkA beads in interphase extract. Probes: microtubules (Alexa 647-tubulin), mCherry-Prc1E, and Kif4A-GFP (Supplemental Video 1). (b) Widefield sequence using GFP-DasraA subunit to visualize the CPC (Supplemental Video 2). (aâ², bâ²) Kymograph analysis along a 30-μm-wide line (cyan box in a and b). Note that the CPC is more focused in interaction zones than Prc1E or Kif4A. |
|
|
FIGURE 3:. Visualization of microtubule dynamics between asters. Panels aâh show analysis of EB1-GFP trajectories imaged by spinning disk confocal microscopy at interaction zones between two asters. (a) EB1 comet trajectories colored by mean direction. (b) EB1 comet trajectories colored by instantaneous velocity. (c) EB1 comet initiations colored by velocity for 5 s after initiation. (d) EB1 comet termination colored by velocity 5 s before termination. (e) Spatial distributions EB1 comet trajectories classified by direction (gray dots: fraction of EB1 comets moving from left to right; blue curve: sigmoidal fit to grey dots; red curve: sigmoidal fit to fraction of EB1 comets moving in opposite direction). (f) Mean instantaneous growth rates (mean ± SEM). (g) EB1 comet density. (h) Fractions of EB1 comets that are growth initiation/terminations (mean ± SD), n = 12 neighboring ROIs (see Materials and Methods for data analysis). (i) Tubulin-A647 image sequence of a field of asters growing and interacting; 20à widefield. Interaction zones between asters were established by 24 min in this example. Note that the microtubule density between asters remained approximately constant for a further 40 min, showing that there is no increase in the density of anti-parallel bundles over time. Images were linearly rescaled to 8 bits to correct for mild photobleaching over the long image sequence. |
|
|
FIGURE 4:. Immunodepletion of Prc1E and Kif4A. (a) Low-mag widefield tubulin images of asters depleted as shown or treated with 100 μM ZM-447439 (AurkB inhibitor). Prc1E and Kif4A depletion had no discernalbe effect on nucleation of microtubule density. AurkB inhibition caused descrease of MT density over time. (bâe) High-mag TIRF images showing microtubules (Alexa 647-tubulin), mCherry-Prc1E, and Kif4A-GFP under the depletion/inhibition above. Zoom-ups of boxed areas are shown on the right. Note that Kif4A localization to bundles depended on Prc1E. Prc1E localization did not depend on Kif4A, but bundles were more spread out in its absence. Both proteins were recruited to bundles when AurkB was inhibited, but the bundles are much more spread out. |
|
|
FIGURE 5:. Prc1E and Kif4A are required for the block to interpenetration between asters. (aâf) Analyses of microtubule growth directions by EB1 tracking of spinning disk confocal images sequences as per Figure 2a. Depletions and add-backs as noted. (g) The D60 parameter, a metric for the degree of interpenetration, was defined as the difference between the interpolated distances where the red and blue curves crossed 60% (see panel a). Plot of mean D60 values (± SD) measured for each treatment (n ⥠3 interaction zones each). The last two bars (control and AurkB inhibition with 100 μM ZM-447439) were replotted from Nguyen et al. (2014) to provide a comparison. Asterisks indicate significant of different from control IgG depletion based on unpaired t test analyses, *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001. |
|
|
FIGURE 6:. Prc1E and Kif4A enforce radial order in isolated asters. (aâe) Plus-end growth trajectories within isolated asters colored by mean direction. Imaging and EB1 tracking methods similar to Figure 2a. Asterisks indicate position of the nucleating center, Immunodepletion/add back conditions as labeled. (aâ²âeâ²) Radial order heat maps showing the local radial order quantified by the R parameter; each square cell measures 5 à 5 μm2 (see Materials and Methods). Redder colors represent higher radial order. White pixels contained too few comet tracks to measure radial order. (f) Radial order parameter R as a function of distance from the aster center for the five asters shown above. Error bars are standard deviations (see Materials and Methods for analysis). Data are truncated at <20 μm, where microtubule growth components in the z-axis complicate analysis. |
|
|
FIGURE 7:. Examples of anti-parallel overlaps in growing asters being eliminated. Examples of anti-parallel microtubule overlap formation and elimination at the edge of growing asters imaged by spinning disk confocal microscopy (Supplemental Videos 7 and 8). Proteins visualized: (a) Alexa 647-tubulin and Kif4A-GFP, Alexa 647-tubulin; (b) Kif4A-GFP, and mCherry-Prc1E. Arrowheads indicate the following: likely plus ends (red), likely minus ends (cyan), microtubule growing out radially from aster (empty), and microtubule growing in opposite direction (full). (a′,b′) Kymographs of examples above along the radially growing microtubule. Events indicated: likely catastrophe (c), likely stabilization (st), and likely rescue (r). |
|
|
FIGURE 8:. Model for function of Prc1E and Kif4A within and between asters. Left box, general function of Prc1E and Kif4A in anti-parallel bundles. Middle box, block to interpenetration at the interaction zone between asters. Right box, enforcement of radial order within single asters by pruning of anti-parallel overlaps. Left box, general function of Prc1E and Kif4A in anti-parallel bundles. Middle box, Block to interpenetration at the interaction zone between asters. Right box, enforcement of radial order within single asters by pruning of anti-parallel overlaps. |
References [+] :
Applegate,
plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics.
2011, Pubmed
Applegate, plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics. 2011, Pubmed
Argiros, Centralspindlin and chromosomal passenger complex behavior during normal and Rappaport furrow specification in echinoderm embryos. 2012, Pubmed
Basant, Aurora B kinase promotes cytokinesis by inducing centralspindlin oligomers that associate with the plasma membrane. 2015, Pubmed
Bieling, A minimal midzone protein module controls formation and length of antiparallel microtubule overlaps. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bringmann, A kinesin-like motor inhibits microtubule dynamic instability. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Canman, Inhibition of Rac by the GAP activity of centralspindlin is essential for cytokinesis. 2008, Pubmed
Canman, Determining the position of the cell division plane. 2003, Pubmed
Field, Spindle-to-cortex communication in cleaving, polyspermic Xenopus eggs. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Field, Xenopus extract approaches to studying microtubule organization and signaling in cytokinesis. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Field, Xenopus egg cytoplasm with intact actin. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Glotzer, The 3Ms of central spindle assembly: microtubules, motors and MAPs. 2009, Pubmed
Groen, Glycogen-supplemented mitotic cytosol for analyzing Xenopus egg microtubule organization. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gruneberg, Relocation of Aurora B from centromeres to the central spindle at the metaphase to anaphase transition requires MKlp2. 2004, Pubmed
Henson, Central Spindle Self-Organization and Cytokinesis in Artificially Activated Sea Urchin Eggs. 2016, Pubmed
Howell, Dissociation of the tubulin-sequestering and microtubule catastrophe-promoting activities of oncoprotein 18/stathmin. 1999, Pubmed
Hu, KIF4 regulates midzone length during cytokinesis. 2011, Pubmed
Hu, Cell polarization during monopolar cytokinesis. 2008, Pubmed
Hyman, Preparation of modified tubulins. 1991, Pubmed
Ishihara, Physical basis of large microtubule aster growth. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ishihara, Microtubule nucleation remote from centrosomes may explain how asters span large cells. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Jantsch-Plunger, CYK-4: A Rho family gtpase activating protein (GAP) required for central spindle formation and cytokinesis. 2000, Pubmed
Jiang, PRC1: a human mitotic spindle-associated CDK substrate protein required for cytokinesis. 1998, Pubmed
Kurasawa, Essential roles of KIF4 and its binding partner PRC1 in organized central spindle midzone formation. 2004, Pubmed
Lewellyn, The chromosomal passenger complex and centralspindlin independently contribute to contractile ring assembly. 2011, Pubmed
Mastronarde, Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells. 1993, Pubmed
McIntosh, Tubulin hooks as probes for microtubule polarity: an analysis of the method and an evaluation of data on microtubule polarity in the mitotic spindle. 1984, Pubmed
Mishima, Central spindle assembly and cytokinesis require a kinesin-like protein/RhoGAP complex with microtubule bundling activity. 2002, Pubmed
Mitchison, Self-organization of stabilized microtubules by both spindle and midzone mechanisms in Xenopus egg cytosol. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mitchison, Growth, interaction, and positioning of microtubule asters in extremely large vertebrate embryo cells. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mollinari, PRC1 is a microtubule binding and bundling protein essential to maintain the mitotic spindle midzone. 2002, Pubmed
Nguyen, Using supported bilayers to study the spatiotemporal organization of membrane-bound proteins. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Nguyen, Spatial organization of cytokinesis signaling reconstituted in a cell-free system. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Peshkin, On the Relationship of Protein and mRNA Dynamics in Vertebrate Embryonic Development. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Petry, Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Portran, Micropatterning microtubules. 2014, Pubmed
Rodrigues, Kinetochore-localized PP1-Sds22 couples chromosome segregation to polar relaxation. 2015, Pubmed
Saxton, Interzone microtubule behavior in late anaphase and telophase spindles. 1987, Pubmed
Shrestha, PRC1 controls spindle polarization and recruitment of cytokinetic factors during monopolar cytokinesis. 2012, Pubmed
Subramanian, Marking and measuring single microtubules by PRC1 and kinesin-4. 2013, Pubmed
Subramanian, Insights into antiparallel microtubule crosslinking by PRC1, a conserved nonmotor microtubule binding protein. 2010, Pubmed
Thévenaz, A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. 1998, Pubmed
Tsai, Aurora A kinase-coated beads function as microtubule-organizing centers and enhance RanGTP-induced spindle assembly. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Vernos, Xklp1, a chromosomal Xenopus kinesin-like protein essential for spindle organization and chromosome positioning. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
White, On the mechanisms of cytokinesis in animal cells. 1983, Pubmed
Wühr, A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wühr, Deep proteomics of the Xenopus laevis egg using an mRNA-derived reference database. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yüce, An ECT2-centralspindlin complex regulates the localization and function of RhoA. 2005, Pubmed
Zhu, Cell cycle-dependent translocation of PRC1 on the spindle by Kif4 is essential for midzone formation and cytokinesis. 2005, Pubmed
