XB-ART-56340
J Gen Physiol
2018 May 07;1505:697-711. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201711782.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
The syndromic deafness mutation G12R impairs fast and slow gating in Cx26 hemichannels.
García IE, Villanelo F, Contreras GF, Pupo A, Pinto BI, Contreras JE, Pérez-Acle T, Alvarez O, Latorre R, Martínez AD, González C.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Mutations in connexin 26 (Cx26) hemichannels can lead to syndromic deafness that affects the cochlea and skin. These mutations lead to gain-of-function hemichannel phenotypes by unknown molecular mechanisms. In this study, we investigate the biophysical properties of the syndromic mutant Cx26G12R (G12R). Unlike wild-type Cx26, G12R macroscopic hemichannel currents do not saturate upon depolarization, and deactivation is faster during hyperpolarization, suggesting that these channels have impaired fast and slow gating. Single G12R hemichannels show a large increase in open probability, and transitions to the subconductance state are rare and short-lived, demonstrating an inoperative fast gating mechanism. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that G12R causes a displacement of the N terminus toward the cytoplasm, favoring an interaction between R12 in the N terminus and R99 in the intracellular loop. Disruption of this interaction recovers the fast and slow voltage-dependent gating mechanisms. These results suggest that the mechanisms of fast and slow gating in connexin hemichannels are coupled and provide a molecular mechanism for the gain-of-function phenotype displayed by the syndromic G12R mutation.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 29643172
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC5940247
???displayArticle.link??? J Gen Physiol
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]
R01 GM099490 NIGMS NIH HHS
Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: gjb2
???displayArticle.disOnts??? autosomal dominant keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
|
|
Figure 1. WT and G12R Cx26 gating kinetics and voltage dependence. Membrane currents were recorded from oocytes under two-electrode voltage clamp in response to depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of â80 mV, stepped in 10-mV increments from â60 to 50 mV, and returned to â80 mV. (a and b) Representative trace of macroscopic currents recorded in oocytes expressing WTCx26 (a) or G12R (b). (c) Normalized conductanceâvoltage relationship of WTCx26 and G12R hemichannels. Data obtained from the instantaneous tail currents taken at â80 mV and measured after 40-s test pulse for each voltage tested. Data symbols and error bars represent mean ± SEM; n = 20 oocytes from five different batches. |
|
|
Figure 2. G12R impairs fast gating. Membrane currents were recorded from oocytes under two-electrode voltage clamp in response to depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of 30 mV, stepped in 10-mV increments to 90 mV, and returned to 30 mV. (a and b) Representative trace of macroscopic currents recorded in oocytes expressing WTCx26 (a) or G12R (b). (c) Current–voltage relationship of WTCx26 and G12R hemichannels. Data symbols and error bars represent mean ± SEM; n = 10 oocytes from three different batches. |
|
|
Figure 3. Single-hemichannel activity recapitulates the macroscopic currents. (a and b) Representative examples of patch-clamp recordings from excised inside-out patches containing WTCx26 (a) or G12R (b) hemichannels. Traces shown were obtained in response to a 3-s test pulse at 90 mV from and returning to a holding potential of 30 mV (mimicking the fast gate macroscopic protocol). Dashed lines represent the closed state (C) and the fully open state (O; subscript numbers indicate two or more channels opening). Each trial consisted of 20 sweeps that were ensemble averaged to recapitulate the kinetics of the macroscopic currents. (c) The ensemble average (orange trace) and the macroscopic trace (black trace) obtained at 90 mV were superimposed for comparison. The time constant of the deactivation kinetics from WTCx26 hemichannel was obtained by fitting the traces to a single exponential. No significant differences were observed. τ values represent mean ± SEM; n = 15 oocytes from three different batches. |
|
|
Figure 4. Fast deactivation kinetics in G12R hemichannels. (a and b) A pulse from a holding potential of â80 to 0 mV and returned to â80 mV was applied to analyze tail currents and their deactivation kinetics in oocytes expressing WTCx26 (a) and G12R (b). Traces show the currents elicited in oocytes bathed in extracellular solution containing 1.8 mM Ca2+ (black traces), 0.25 mM Ca2+ (red traces), or 0.01 mM Ca2+ (blue traces). (c) Time constants of the deactivation as a function of Ca2+ concentration plotted using a semilogarithmic scale. The dotted lines represent the best linear fit to the WTCx26 and G12R mutant hemichannelsâ time-constant data. (d) Graph depicting normalized peak hemichannel tail currents as a function of Ca2+ concentration in WTCx26 (open circles) and G12R (red circles). Solid lines are the best fit to the data using a Hill equation for WTCx26 (black line) and G12R (red line; Eq. 1). The data points represent mean ± SEM; n = 10. (e) Representative examples of patch-clamp recordings from excised inside-out patches containing WTCx26 or G12R hemichannels. Traces shown were obtained in response to a 45-s test pulse at 0 mV from a holding potential of â80 mV and returned to â80 mV during an additional 45 s. Dashed lines represent the closed state (C) and the opening of hemichannels. Each trial consisted of 10 sweeps that were ensemble averaged to recapitulate the kinetics of the macroscopic currents. (f) The ensemble averages (black trace for WTCx26; red trace for G12R) and the macroscopic traces (red trace for WTCx26; black trace for G12R) obtained at â80 mV were superimposed for comparison. The time constant of the deactivation kinetics from WTCx26 and G12R hemichannels was obtained by fitting the traces to a single exponential. No significant differences were observed. Ï values represent mean ± SEM; n = 15 oocytes from three different batches. |
|
|
Figure 5. The G12R mutation increases open probability without modifying single-channel conductance. (a and b) Representative traces of WTCx26 (a) or G12R (b) single channels recorded at 20, 40, and 60 mV. The dashed lines represent the closed state (C), the fully open state (O), and the subconductance state (Or) of hemichannels. Note that conductance substates occur rarely and show fast kinetics in G12R hemichannels. (c) Graph depicting the plot of the current amplitude (I, pA) of the fully open state O obtained at different voltages (millivolts) for WTCx26 (black circles) and G12R (red circles). Black solid (WTCx26) and dashed (G12R) lines represent the best linear regression fit. The slope of the I-V relationship determined fully open state O slope conductance (measured at 0 mV). (d) Graph depicting the plot of the open probability (Po) of the fully open state at different voltages (millivolts) for WTCx26 (black circles) and G12R (red circles). The data points represent mean ± SEM; n = 20 oocytes from five different batches. |
|
|
Figure 6. G12R mutation causes the N terminus to move toward the cytoplasm and interact with residues in the intracellular loop. (a) Structure of the WTCx26 hemichannel showing the N terminus (pink), TM1 (red), parahelix (orange), ELs (green), and intracellular loop (light blue). (b) Graph depicting the mean pore radius variation in function of pore axis during simulation. The region around the N terminus in G12R hemichannels is slightly displaced toward the cytoplasm. The narrowing of the pore in the parahelix regions does not change in G12R versus WTCx26. Data points represent mean ± SEM; n = 12. (c) Superimposition of representative monomers of WTCx26 (black) and G12R (red). Insets show the distances between residue 12 and the R99 in both WTCx26 (13.7 à ) and G12R (4.8 à ). |
|
|
Figure 7. Disrupting the interaction between R12 and R99 rescues the fast gating activation. Membrane currents recorded from oocytes under two-electrode voltage clamp in response to depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of â80 mV, stepped in 20-mV increments from â60 to 60 mV, and returned to â80 mV or representative patch-clamp single-channel recordings in oocytes from a holding potential of 0 mV and stepped to 40 mV. (aâf) Representative traces of macroscopic currents (left) and single-hemichannel recordings (right) from oocytes expressing WTCx26 (a), G12R (b), G12R/R99D (c), G12R/R99K (d), G12R/R99A (e), and R99A (f). Dashed lines in right panel indicate different current levels (O, fully open; Or, subconductance; C, closed). (g) Graph depicting the macroscopic currentâvoltage relationship of hemichannels calculated from the instantaneous tail currents. Data points represent mean ± SEM; n = 3. |
|
|
Figure 8. Molecular model of the gain of function caused by G12R hemichannels. (a) Cartoon depicting a macroscopic trace of WTCx26 hemichannel showing the reduction of current amplitude at 40 mV. At the single-channel level, this reduction in the current amplitude could be explained by the transition from the fully open state (red dashed line) to a subconductance state (green dashed line). (b) Cartoon depicting a macroscopic trace of G12R hemichannels illustrating the lack of current reduction observed in WTCx26. At the single-channel level, this difference could be caused by the lack of fast gating activation resulting from the absence of transitions to the subconductance state. This altered functioning would be caused by interactions between R12 and R99, which trap the N terminus in a rigid position, preventing its regular function and the activation of the fast gate. |
|
|
Figure S1.âPosition of the N terminus in WT and mutant Cx26 hemichannels. Graph depicting the position of the N terminus in WT and mutant Cx26 hemichannels obtained by measuring the geometrical distance between the centers of mass of the N terminus with respect to the center of mass of the whole structure. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 12. |
|
|
Figure S2. Local bending angles in TM2 (residues 75–105) for WTCx26 (black line) and G12R (red line). The peaks at residue P87 in both WTCx26 and G12R reveal the presence of a kink. Shadow represents SD; n = 4. The percentages of the total simulation time in which the formation of a hydrogen bond between T86 and I82 can be observed are summarized in Table 2. No differences were observed between WTCx26 and G12R hemichannels. |
|
|
Figure S3. Root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of simulated systems as a function of residue number. Three regions (N terminus region, K41 residue, and intracellular loop region) can be identified that show a different behavior in WTCx26 versus the G12R mutant. In general, the G12R mutant protein shows decreased mobility with respect to the WTCx26 in the indicated regions, especially in the intracellular loop. Data are presented as mean ± SD; n = 4. |
|
|
Figure S4. Correlation between N terminus displacement and the side chain angle of R12 (in G12R) in relation to the z axis. Different colors indicate different replicas (n = 4). |
|
|
Figure S5. Single-hemichannel activity recapitulates the macroscopic currents in G12R/R99A. (a–c) Representative examples of patch-clamp recordings from inside-out patches containing WTCx26 (a), G12R (b), and G12R/R99A (c) hemichannels. Traces shown were obtained in response to a 3-s test pulse at 90 mV from and returning to a holding potential of 30 mV (mimicking the fast gate macroscopic protocol). Dashed lines represent the closed state (C) and the fully open state (O; subscript numbers indicate two or more channels opening). Each trial consisted of 20 sweeps that were ensemble averaged to recapitulate the kinetics of the macroscopic currents. The ensemble average (orange trace for WTCx26 and G12R; light blue trace for G12R/R99A) and the macroscopic trace (black trace) obtained at 90 mV were superimposed for comparison. The time constants of the deactivation kinetics were obtained by fitting the traces to a single exponential. τ values represent mean ± SEM; n = 15 oocytes from three different batches. |
References [+] :
Arita,
A novel N14Y mutation in Connexin26 in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: analyses of altered gap junctional communication and molecular structure of N terminus of mutated Connexin26.
2006, Pubmed
Arita, A novel N14Y mutation in Connexin26 in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: analyses of altered gap junctional communication and molecular structure of N terminus of mutated Connexin26. 2006, Pubmed
Arora, A novel connexin50 mutation associated with congenital nuclear pulverulent cataracts. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bargiello, Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Batir, Structural studies of N-terminal mutants of Connexin 26 and Connexin 32 using (1)H NMR spectroscopy. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bennett, An electrostatic mechanism for Ca(2+)-mediated regulation of gap junction channels. 2016, Pubmed
Bergoffen, Connexin mutations in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. 1993, Pubmed
Bevans, Regulation of connexin channels by pH. Direct action of the protonated form of taurine and other aminosulfonates. 1999, Pubmed
Dobrowolski, Connexin-caused genetic diseases and corresponding mouse models. 2009, Pubmed
Ebihara, Xenopus connexin38 forms hemi-gap-junctional channels in the nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gaietta, Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. 2002, Pubmed
García, From Hyperactive Connexin26 Hemichannels to Impairments in Epidermal Calcium Gradient and Permeability Barrier in the Keratitis-Ichthyosis-Deafness Syndrome. 2016, Pubmed
García, Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome-associated Cx26 mutants produce nonfunctional gap junctions but hyperactive hemichannels when co-expressed with wild type Cx43. 2015, Pubmed
Gerido, Aberrant hemichannel properties of Cx26 mutations causing skin disease and deafness. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Goodenough, Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. 1996, Pubmed
Kelsell, Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. 1997, Pubmed
Kelsell, Connexin mutations associated with palmoplantar keratoderma and profound deafness in a single family. 2000, Pubmed
Kwon, Molecular dynamics simulations of the Cx26 hemichannel: evaluation of structural models with Brownian dynamics. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kyle, An intact connexin N-terminus is required for function but not gap junction formation. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lagree, Specific amino-acid residues in the N-terminus and TM3 implicated in channel function and oligomerization compatibility of connexin43. 2003, Pubmed
Lampe, Regulation of gap junctions by phosphorylation of connexins. 2000, Pubmed
Lee, Connexin mutations causing skin disease and deafness increase hemichannel activity and cell death when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lomize, OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database. 2006, Pubmed
Lopez, Mechanism of gating by calcium in connexin hemichannels. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lopez, Insights on the mechanisms of Ca(2+) regulation of connexin26 hemichannels revealed by human pathogenic mutations (D50N/Y). 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Maeda, Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. 2009, Pubmed
Magalhaes, Contribution of unusual arginine-arginine short-range interactions to stabilization and recognition in proteins. 1994, Pubmed
Martí-Renom, Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. 2000, Pubmed
Mazereeuw-Hautier, Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: disease expression and spectrum of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in 14 patients. 2007, Pubmed
Müller, Conformational changes in surface structures of isolated connexin 26 gap junctions. 2002, Pubmed
Neves, Unusual arginine formations in protein function and assembly: rings, strings, and stacks. 2012, Pubmed
Nielsen, Permeant-specific gating of connexin 30 hemichannels. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Oh, Voltage regulation of connexin channel conductance. 2015, Pubmed
Olsson, PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions. 2011, Pubmed
Oshima, Three-dimensional structure of a human connexin26 gap junction channel reveals a plug in the vestibule. 2007, Pubmed
Oshima, Atomic structure of the innexin-6 gap junction channel determined by cryo-EM. 2016, Pubmed
Pfahnl, Gating of cx46 gap junction hemichannels by calcium and voltage. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Pinto, Charged Residues at the First Transmembrane Region Contribute to the Voltage Dependence of the Slow Gate of Connexins. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Postic, An empirical energy function for structural assessment of protein transmembrane domains. 2015, Pubmed
Ri, The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Richard, Mutations in the human connexin gene GJB3 cause erythrokeratodermia variabilis. 1998, Pubmed
Rubinos, Mechanism of inhibition of connexin channels by the quinine derivative N-benzylquininium. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sanchez, Syndromic deafness mutations at Asn 14 differentially alter the open stability of Cx26 hemichannels. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sanchez, The D50N mutation and syndromic deafness: altered Cx26 hemichannel properties caused by effects on the pore and intersubunit interactions. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sánchez, Differentially altered Ca2+ regulation and Ca2+ permeability in Cx26 hemichannels formed by the A40V and G45E mutations that cause keratitis ichthyosis deafness syndrome. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Segretain, Regulation of connexin biosynthesis, assembly, gap junction formation, and removal. 2004, Pubmed
Söhl, An update on connexin genes and their nomenclature in mouse and man. 2003, Pubmed
Trexler, Voltage gating and permeation in a gap junction hemichannel. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
van Steensel, A phenotype resembling the Clouston syndrome with deafness is associated with a novel missense GJB2 mutation. 2004, Pubmed
Verselis, Loop gating of connexin hemichannels involves movement of pore-lining residues in the first extracellular loop domain. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Verselis, Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. 1994, Pubmed , Xenbase
Verselis, Divalent cations regulate connexin hemichannels by modulating intrinsic voltage-dependent gating. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Woolf, Structure, energetics, and dynamics of lipid-protein interactions: A molecular dynamics study of the gramicidin A channel in a DMPC bilayer. 1996, Pubmed
Yotsumoto, Novel mutations in GJB2 encoding connexin-26 in Japanese patients with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. 2003, Pubmed
Zonta, Role of gamma carboxylated Glu47 in connexin 26 hemichannel regulation by extracellular Ca²⁺: insight from a local quantum chemistry study. 2014, Pubmed
